
Today is Thursday. Yesterday I read a negative article about a fraternity. Tuesday, I read a negative article about a fraternity. Monday, I read an article about a fraternity that was negative. As I read more negative articles about our fraternal brothers and sisters nationwide, I shook my head, like you, in disgust. Hazing? Alcohol abuse? A rape survey? Really? Come on members of Sigma Phi Epsilon at the University of Vermont!
For many of us professionals, we bang out head on our desk asking, “WHY?!?!” Why do our members continue to do stupid things? I too, ponder this question over and over. How did we get here? What am I missing?
After doing some informal research amongst my peers’ thoughts on Facebook, Twitter, and other social media outlets, I started to see a trend. Most thoughts were a call to action to get back to our founder’s values. Challenge students to live our founders’ beliefs. See and understand the mission and vision our founders’ had when they created our organizations.
As I read more and more of my peers’ thoughts, a light bulb moment hit me.
Our students have no idea what we mean to live our founder’s values.
Why? They don’t know who their founders are. Or, they don’t know the history of their organization. Or, they don’t understand what our founders’ meant by living their creed, mission, and vision. Or, they simply don’t understand what our founders’ wanted when our organizations were created.
Simply put, we are challenging students to do something they have no education on or very little knowledge of to comprehend. Think about it, how often do students talk about their founding principles? Once? Maybe twice a year? How often do students talk about their organization’s history in a given semester? Maybe once? How many students come into our offices and ask, “Hey Greek Advisor, can we talk about why my organization was founded?”
If we use Simon Sinek’s theory of starting with the “why”, my informal research would be dead on. Why aren’t our members living the values our founders’ set forth for us? If we answer that question first, we can then move on to how we can fix the problem and what we can do to make positive change.
As professionals, we need to take a step back. We need to go back to the basics my friends. When an organization screws up, we need to explain to them that for every stupid decision, there is a consequence. Once we explain that, we can ask questions such as, “do you think your founder(s) would be proud of this” or “how does this signify the values of your organization?” However, we must pay close attention to how they respond because if they look at you with a blank stare or recite the values as if they are being tested, we need to reframe the questions we ask them. Do you know your founder(s)? Do you know your organization’s values? Pull out their mission/vision/creed statements and ask the student what that means to them on a daily basis? Then, relate it to the incident at hand.
I feel we have made unwarranted assumptions about our students’ knowledge of their organization’s history, values, and ritual. I’m not saying our students are incompetent or dumb. I simply think we need to take a few steps back before shouting “live your values like your founders would” when the student may be saying, “what the hell does that mean?” Even at our national conferences, institutes, and other leadership initiatives, the “ahh ha” moments occur on the day or night when we as professionals help explain how the ritual and how the values of organization impact them (or should impact them) on a daily basis. In those moments, the students realize, “hey, this ritual stuff is pretty sweet” or “wow, I now realize how important these values are to my organization and my personal actions.” Now, consider the fact that those national conferences, institutes, and leadership initiatives only target a small subset of our students; you can understand that we have a lot of work to do.
I believe that if we can change the tone of our conversations when actions of our brothers and sisters are inconsistent with their founding principles, I think we will start to see some positive results. Similarly, if we stop assuming what our students may or may not know, we can really target our areas of focus in our respective communities and institutions.
What do you think?








